Evaluation of Hybrid Business Models in Indonesian State-Owned Enterprises: A Literature Review of the Reality of Social Entrepreneurship in PNM and Danantara

Adrian Bintang Ramadhan; Alfathir Syahendra; Harry Z Soeratin; Munasiron Miftah; Rebecca Yolanda Artha Uli

doi:10.35899/biej.v8i3.1212

Adrian Bintang Ramadhan Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Alfathir Syahendra Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Harry Z Soeratin Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Munasiron Miftah Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta
Rebecca Yolanda Artha Uli Universitas Pembangunan Nasional "Veteran" Jakarta

DOI: https://doi.org/10.35899/biej.v8i3.1212

Abstract viewed: 73 times

Download Pdf downloaded: 73 times

Keywords: Social Entrepreneurship, Hybrid Business Model, PNM, Danantara, Research Gap, Strategic Management

Abstract

The transformation of State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs) toward hybrid business models has become a key strategy in addressing social challenges in Indonesia. However, there is skepticism about whether these initiatives truly create independent social enterprises or simply conventional social assistance programs. This Literature Review Paper (LRP) aims to evaluate the reality of social entrepreneurship at PT Permodalan Nasional Madani (PNM) and PT Daya Anagata Nusantara (Danantara) through a systematic literature review of 15 accredited academic journals covering the years 2014–2024. The analytical method used is matrix synthesis to identify research gaps from a strategic perspective. The findings of this review indicate significant managerial and contextual gaps, where existing programs often face the risk of mission drift due to pressures for financial efficiency overshadowing the social mission. Furthermore, there is a lack of integration of impact measurement metrics such as Social Return on Investment (SROI) into major investment strategies. The implications of this study emphasize the need for a reorientation of KPIs that focus on customer independence and accountability for social impact to ensure the program's transition into a sustainable social entrepreneurship entity. This paper provides a theoretical contribution to the strategic management literature on managing hybrid organizations in the Indonesian public sector.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

MM Ashraf, MA Razzaque, S.-T. Liaw, PK Ray, and MR Hasan, "Social business as an entrepreneurship model in emerging economies: Systematic review and case study," Manag. Decis. , 2018, doi: 10.1108/MD-04-2017-0343.

WN Angeline, HZ Soeratin, and M. Miftah, “Strategic management under the ESG framework: Enhancing corporate sustainability and stakeholder trust,” vol. 3, no. 2, 2024, doi: 10.62108/asrj.v3i2.8384.

ZS Beyene, “Practice, challenges and opportunities of social enterprises in Ethiopia: A case study of member organizations of the Social Enterprise Ethiopia Association,” Am. J. Organs. Leadersh. Dev. , vol. 7, no. 1, pp. 107–125, 2022, doi: 10.63990/2022ajoldvol7iss1pp107-125.

B. Hasanah, A. Sururi, DP Prananda, and AM Noval, “Evaluation of the micro, small, and medium enterprise program (social entrepreneurship model in Serang City),” vol. 15, no. 2, 2022, doi: 10.21107/pamator.v15i2.17529.

F. Ferdousi, "Impact of microfinance on sustainable entrepreneurship development," Dev. Stud. Res. , pp. 51–63, 2015, doi: 10.1080/21665095.2015.1058718.

S. Gupta, S. Beninger, and J. Ganesh, “A hybrid approach to innovation by social enterprises: lessons from Africa,” Soc. Enterp. J. , vol. 11, no. 1, pp. 89–112, 2015, doi: 10.1108/SEJ-04-2014-0023.

T. Certo and T. Miller, “Social entrepreneurship: Key issues and concepts,” vol. 51, no. 4, 2008, doi: 10.1016/j.bushor.2008.02.009.

MS Marta, D. Kurniasari, and D. Kurniasari, “Interaction of social support on the relationship between entrepreneurial education, self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intentions,” vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 16–26, 2019.

R. Idayu, M. Shahrizal, and PK Nikolic, "Enable the disabled as technopreneur; Understanding the challenges," vol. 5, no. 7, 2018.

NA Hamdani, R. Setiawan, and M. Soni, "Proceedings Book of International Conference on Association of Indonesian Entrepreneurship Study Programs 3rd International Seminar on Entrepreneurship Sustainability The Role of Entrepreneurial Intention as a Mediating Variable in Enhancing Opportunity," 2025.

J. Gutierrez-Goiria, L. San-Jose, and J.L. Retolaza, “Social efficiency in microfinance institutions: Identifying how to improve it,” J. Int. Dev. , 2016.

H.L. Rahim and S. Mohtar, “International Academic Research Journal of Business and Technology,” vol. 1, no. 1, pp. 9–15, 2015.

M. Zhao and J. Han, “Tensions and Risks of Social Enterprises' Scaling Strategies: The Case of Microfinance Institutions in China,” J. Soc. Entrep. , 2019, doi: 10.1080/19420676.2019.1604404.

G. Abdul et al. , “Information Technology Resources and Innovation Performance in Higher Education,” vol. 15, no. 04, pp. 117–125, 2021.

S. Echdar, “Management and Business Research Methods.” GHALIA INDONESIA, 2017.

A. Thahira, A. Rimbasari, and R. Eka, “The involvement of effective leadership and social entrepreneurship in optimal MSME performance,” vol. 19, no. 2. 2023.

NA Hamdani, R. Muladi, G. Abdul, and F. Maulani, "Digital Marketing Impact on Consumer Decision-Making Process," vol. 220, no. Gcbme 2021, pp. 153–158, 2022.

S. Santoso, "Relationship between Social Media, Organizational Support, Subjective Norms and Perceived Behavioral Control to Form Entrepreneurial Intention," Expert J. Bus. Manag. , vol. 9, no. 1, pp. 1–10, 2021.