State of The Art of Corporate Entrepreneurship on State Owned Entreprises: A Bibliometrics Study
Abstract
Organizations today have been faced with a variety of dynamic environmental changes. The sustainability and sustainability of the organization can be threatened if the organization is unwilling to formulate innovations as part of a strategy to adapt. One of the determinants of the internal environment to adopt innovation is a concept called corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Corporate entrepreneurship is a fundamental element in organizational and economic development. Although many researchers have provided evidence that corporate entrepreneurship improves organizational performance, these studies only examine corporate entrepreneurship in the private sector in large companies and small and medium-sized enterprises. The development of corporate entrepreneurship research theory in state-owned enterprises is still very limited. This research will aim to provide a mapping overview of the development of corporate entrepreneurship research in state-owned enterprises that can later produce further background and deeper insights. In addition, mapping results can also be used as a basis to develop the concept of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises. Based on the overall results of the study, it can be concluded that research on the concept of corporate entrepreneurship in state-owned enterprises in the last 26 years is really still very little done. The research findings are quite surprising because they produce indications that corporate entrepreneurship research studies on state-owned enterprises still need serious attention to be explored and exploited scientifically in today's very dynamic era of uncertainty.
Organisasi saat ini telah dihadapkan dengan berbagai perubahan lingkungan yang dinamis. Keberlangsungan dan keberlanjutan organisasi dapat terancam apabila organisasi tidak mau untuk merumuskan inovasi sebagai bagian dari strategi untuk beradaptasi. Salah satu penentu lingkungan internal untuk mengadopsi inovasi adalah konsep yang disebut corporate entrepreneurship strategy. Corporate entrepreneurship merupakan elemen fundamental dalam pengembangan organisasi dan ekonomi. Meskipun banyak peneliti telah memberikan bukti bahwa corporate entrepreneurship meningkatkan kinerja organisasi, berbagai penelitian tersebut hanya meneliti corporate entrepreneurship pada sektor swasta pada perusahaan besar dan perusahaan kecil menengah. Perkembangan teori penelitian corporate entrepreneurship pada badan usaha milik negara masih sangat terbatas. Penelitian ini akan bertujuan untuk memberikan gambaran pemetaan dari perkembangan penelitian corporate entrepreneurship pada badan usaha milik negara yang nantinya dapat menghasilkan latar belakang lebih lanjut dan wawasan yang lebih mendalam. Selain itu, hasil pemetaan juga dapat digunakan sebagai dasar untuk mengembangkan konsep corporate entrepreneurship pada badan usaha milik negara. Berdasarkan hasil keseluruhan penelitian, dapat disimpulkan bahwa penelitian mengenai konsep corporate entrepreneurship pada badan usaha milik negara pada 26 tahun terakhir benar-benar masih sangat sedikit dilakukan. Temuan penelitian cukup mengejutkan karena menghasilkan indikasi bahwa kajian penelitian corporate entrepreneurship pada badan usaha milik negara masih perlu perhatian yang serius untuk dieksplorasi dan dieksploitasi secara ilmiah pada era ketidakpastian yang sangat dinamis saat ini.
Downloads
References
H. Skipworth, E. Delbufalo, and C. Mena, “Logistics and procurement outsourcing in the healthcare sector: A comparative analysis,” Elsevier, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.emj.2020.04.002.
M. I. M. Nasir, M. W. Ramli, and S. H. M. Som, “Now Look What You’ve Done, COVID-19! The Impact on Academic Survival among Postgraduate Students in Malaysia,” 2021, doi: 10.6007/IJARBSS/v11-i2/8430.
C. Kearney, R. D. Hisrich, and F. Roche, “Public And Private Sector Entrepreneurship: Similarities, Differences Or A Combination?,” J. Small Bus. Enterp. Dev., vol. 16, no. 1, pp. 26–46, 2009.
B. Antoncic and R. D. Hisrich, “Corporate entrepreneurship contingencies and organizational wealth creation,” J. Manag. Dev., 2004.
R. A. Burgelman, “Managing the new venture division: Research findings and implications for strategic management,” Strategic Management Journal, 2985. .
W. D. Guth and A. Ginsberg, “Guest Editors’ Introduction: Corporate Entrepreneurship,” Strateg. Manag. J., vol. 11, no. Corporate Entrepreneuship, pp. 5–15, 1990.
C. L. Wang, “Entrepreneurial Orientation, Learning Orientation, and Firm Performance,” Sage J., vol. 32, no. 4, pp. 635–657, 2008.
S. A. Zahra, “Predictors and Financial Outcomes of Corporate Entrepreneurship: An Exploratory Study,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 6, 1991.
M. H. Morris and F. F. Jones, Entrepreneurship In Established Organizations: The Case Of The Public Sector. 1999.
R. J. Sadler, “Corporate entrepreneurship and government business enterprises : the pre-paradigmatic dance of the chameleon,” Southern Cross University, 1999.
V. Souitaris and S. Zerbinati, “Entrepreneurship in the Public Sector: A Framework of Analysis in European Local Governments,” Entrep. Reg. Dev., vol. 17, 2005, doi: 10.1080/0898562042000310723.
L. A. Zampetakis and V. Moustakis, “Linking creativity with entrepreneurial intention: A structural approach,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 2, no. 3, pp. 413–428, 2006.
E. T. Boris and C. E. Steuerle, Nonprofits & Government: Collaboration & Conflict, 2nd ed. Washington, DC: The Urban Institute Press, 2006.
M. H. Moore, Creating public value: Strategic management in government. Harvard university press, 1995.
D. Audretsch, “Entrepreneurship Research. In Management Decision,” vol. 50, no. 5, pp. 755–764, 2012, doi: 10.1108/00251741211227384.
D. Urbano and A. Turró, “Conditioning Factors For Corporate Entrepreneurship: An In(Ex)Ternal Approach,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 379–396, 2013, doi: 10.1007/S11365-013-0261-8.
C. D. Jones, P. M. Jolly, C. J. Lubojacky, G. P. Martin, and L. R. Gomez-Mejia, “Behavioral Agency And Corporate Entrepreneurship: Ceo Equity Incentives & Competitive Behavior,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 15, no. 3, pp. 1017–1039, 2019, doi: 0.1007/S11365-019-00576-7.
P. M. Kreiser, D. F. Kuratko, J. G. Covin, R. D. Ireland, and J. S. Hornsby, “Corporate Entrepreneurship Strategy: Extending Our Knowledge Boundaries Through Configuration Theory,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 56, no. 2, pp. 739–758, 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11187-019-00198-X.
M. Urbaniec and A. Zur, “Business Model Innovation In Corporate Entrepreneurship: Exploratory Insights From Corporate Accelerators.,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 17, no. 2, pp. 865–888, 2021, doi: 10.1007/S11365-020-00646-1.
J. G. Covin and M. P. Miles, Corporate Entrepreneurship And The Pursuit Of Competitive Advantage. 1999.
J. Karimi and Z. Walter, “Corporate Entrepreneurship, Disruptive Business Model Innovation Adoption, And Its Performance: The Case Of The Newspaper Industry,” Long Range Plann., vol. 49, no. 3, pp. 342–360, 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.Lrp.2015.09.004.
D. Miller and P. H. Friesen, “Archetypes Of Strategy Formulation. Management Science,” vol. 9, no. 24, pp. 921–933, 1978.
N. Venkatraman, “The Concept Of Fit In Strategy Research: Toward Verbal And Statistical Correspondence,” Acad. Manag. Rev., vol. 3, no. 14, pp. 423–444, 1989.
D. Slevin, The Influence Of Organization Structure On The Utility Of An Entrepreneurial Top Management Style. 1988.
M. Bierwerth, C. Schwens, R. Isidor, and R. Kabst, “Corporate Entrepreneurship And Performance: A Meta-Analysis,” Small Bus. Econ., vol. 45, no. 2, pp. 255–278, 2015.
P. C. Nutt, “Comparing Public And Private Sector Decision-Making Practices,” J. Public Adm. Res. Theory, vol. 16, no. 2, pp. 289–318, 2006, doi: 10.1093/Jopart/Mui041.
J. S. Hornsby, D. F. Kuratko, and S. A. Zahra, “Middle Managers’ Perception Of The Internal Environment For Corporate Entrepreneurship: Assessing A Measurement Scale,” J. Bus. Ventur., vol. 17, no. 3, pp. 253–273, 2002, doi: 10.1016/S0883-9026(00)00059-8.
J. G. Covin and D. P. Slevin, “A Conceptual Model Of Entrepreneurship As Firm Behavior.,” 1991.
J. Hornsby, I. Peña-Legazkue, and M. Guerrero, “Guest Editorial: The Role Of Corporate Entrepreneurship In The Current Organizational And Economic Landscape,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 9, no. 3, pp. 295–305, 2013, doi: 10.1007/S11365-013-0255-6.
Q. He, M. Wang, and C. Martínez-Fuentes, “[17]. He, Q., Wang, M., & Martínez-Fuentes, C. (2020). Impact Of Corporate Entrepreneurial Strategy On Firm Performance In China. International Entrepreneurship And Management Journal, 16(4), 1427–1444. Https://Doi.Org/10.1007/S11365-020-00678-7,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 16, no. 4, pp. 1427–1444, 2020, doi: 10.1007/S11365-020-00678-7.
T. Tremml, “Linking Two Worlds? Entrepreneurial Orientation In Public Enterprises: A Systematic Review And Research Agenda,” 2018.
S. Kraus, M. Breier, M. P. Jones, and M. Hughes, “Individual Entrepreneurial Orientation And Intrapreneurship In The Public Sector,” Int. Entrep. Manag. J., vol. 15, no. 4, pp. 1247–1268, 2019, doi: 10.1007/S11365-019-00593-6.
N. Jia, K. Huang, and C. M. Zhang, “Public Governance, Corporate Governance, And Firm Innovation: An Examination Of State-Owned Enterprises,” Acad. Manag., vol. 62, no. 1, pp. 220–247, 2019, doi: 0.5465/Amj.2016.0543.
N. G. Álvarez and A. Argothy, “Research, Development And Growth In State-Owned Enterprises: Empirical Evidence From Ecuador,” Ind. Innov., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 158–175, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1493982.
A. G. López, U. Arzubiaga, E. S. Roman, and A. De Massis, “The Visible Hand Of Corporate Entrepreneurship In State-Owned Enterprises: A Longitudinal Study Of The Spanish National Postal Operator.,” 2020.
D. Budiman, D. Y. Lin, and S. Singham, “Improving Performance At State-Owned Enterprises,” 2009.
M. W. Peng, G. D. Bruton, C. V. Stan, and Y. Huang, “Theories Of The (State-Owned) Firm,” Asia Pacific J. Manag., vol. 33, no. 2, pp. 293–317, 2016, doi: 10.1007/S10490-016-9462-3.
G. D. Bruton, M. W. Peng, D. Ahlstrom, C. Stan, and K. Vu, “State-Owned Enterprises Around The World As Hybrid Organizations,” Acad. Manag. Perspect., vol. 29, no. 1, pp. 92–114, 2015, doi: 10.5465/Amp.2013.0069.
M. Benassi and M. Landoni, “State-Owned Enterprises As Knowledge-Explorer Agents,” Ind. Innov., vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 218–241, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13662716.2018.1529554.
Oecd, OECD Guidelines On Corporate Governance Of State-Owned Enterprises. 2015.
M. Landoni, “Corporatization And Internationalization Of State-Owned Enterprises: The Role Of Institutional Intermediaries,” Int. J. Public Sect. Manag., vol. 31, no. 2, pp. 221–240, 2018, doi: 10.1108/Ijpsm-03-2017-0076.
P. Tõnurist and E. Karo, “State Owned Enterprises As Instruments Of Innovation Policy,” Ann. Public Coop. Econ., vol. 87, no. 4, pp. 623–648, 2016, doi: 10.1111/Apce.12126.
J. Tang, Z. Tang, and B. J. Cowden, “Exploring The Relationship Between Entrepreneurial Orientation, Ceo Dual Values, And Sme Performance In State-Owned Vs. Nonstate-Owned Enterprises In China.,” Entrep. Theory Pract., vol. 41, no. 6, pp. 883–908, 2017.
G. Currie, M. Humphreys, D. Ucbasaran, and S.Mcmanus, “Entrepreneurial Leadership In The English Public Sector: Paradox Or Possibility? Public Administration,” vol. 86, no. 4, pp. 987–100, 2008, doi: 10.1111/J.1467-9299.2008.00736.X.
D. Meissner, D. Sarpong, and N. S. Vonortas, “Introduction To The Special Issue On ‘Innovation In State Owned Enterprises: Implications For Technology Management And Industrial Development’: Guest Editors,” Routledge, vol. 26, no. 2, pp. 121–126, 2019, doi: 10.1080/13662716.2019.1551838.
P. Choudhury and T. Khanna, “Toward Resource Independence-Why State-Owned Entities Become Multinationals: An Empirical Study Of India’s Public R&D Laboratories,” pp. 145–173, 2018, doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-51715-5_7.
U. Arzubiaga, T. Iturralde, A. Maseda, and J. Kotlar, “Entrepreneurial Orientation And Firm Performance In Family Smes: The Moderating Effects Of Family, Women, And Strategic Involvement In The Board Of Directors.,” 2017.
Y. Kim, “Stimulating Entrepreneurial Practices In The Public Sector: The Roles Of Organizational Characteristics.,” Adm. Soc., vol. 42, no. 7, pp. 780–814, 2010, doi: 10.1177/0095399710377432.
A. K. Das, “In Introduction To Research Evaluation Metrics And Related Indicators, (B. K. Sen),” Unesco, 2015.
A. A. Chadegani, S. H. Salehi, M. M. M. Yunus, H. Fooladi, M. M. Farhadi, and N. A. Ebrahim, “A Comparison Between Two Main Academic Literature Collections: Web Of Science And Scopus Databases,” Asian Soc. Sci., vol. 9, no. 5, pp. 18–26, 2013, doi: 10.5539/Ass.V9n5p18.
F. Franceschini, D. Maisano, and L. Mastrogiacomo, “Empirical Analysis And Classification Of Database Errors In Scopus And Web Of Science,” J. Informetr., vol. 10, no. 4, pp. 933–953, 2016, doi: 10.1016/J.Joi.2016.07.003.
L. Ferrari, A. Cavaliere, E. De Marchi, and A. Banterle, “Can Nudging Improve The Environmental Impact Of Food Supply Chain? A Systematic Review,” Elsevier, vol. 91, no. Trends In Food Science And Technology, pp. 184–192, 2019, doi: 10.1016/J.Tifs.2019.07.004.
N. J. Van Eck and L. Waltman, “Vosviewer Manual Manual For Vosviewer Version 1.6.17.,” 2021.
